Comparison of Elective Cesarean Section and Vaginal Delivery Outcomes: A Study of 100 Patients at Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences
Article Information
Publication Timeline
- Received10 November 2024
- Accepted12 December 2024
Abstract
Background: This study compares maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective cesarean sections (C-sections) and vaginal deliveries among 100 patients at Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences, Hapur. Of the participants, 40 underwent elective C-sections, and 60 had vaginal deliveries. The study highlights differences in recovery times, complication rates, and neonatal health, emphasizing the need for individualized decision-making in choosing the mode of delivery.
Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective cesarean sections and vaginal deliveries to determine the advantages and risks associated with each delivery method. 1. To evaluate maternal outcomes, including complication rates, recovery times, and satisfaction levels, for both elective cesarean sections and vaginal deliveries. 2. To assess neonatal outcomes, such as Apgar scores, respiratory complications, and birth injuries, associated with each mode of delivery. 3. To identify factors influencing maternal satisfaction with the chosen delivery method. 4. To provide evidence-based recommendations for selecting the most appropriate mode of delivery for different clinical scenarios
Methodology: Study Design: Prospective observational study conducted from March 2024 to November 2024. Population: 100 pregnant women admitted for delivery at Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences.
Results: 1. Elective C-section (n = 40): Higher rates of surgical complications (10% surgical site infections, 5% postoperative hemorrhage). Longer recovery time (average 4 days hospital stay, 6-8 weeks full recovery). 2. Vaginal Delivery (n = 60): Higher incidence of perineal trauma (25%) and postpartum hemorrhage (8%). Quicker recovery time (average 2 days hospital stay, 2-4 weeks full recovery).
Neonatal Outcomes: 1. Elective C-section: 95% of neonates had Apgar scores ≥7 at 1 minute; 10% experienced transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN). 2. Vaginal Delivery: 92% of neonates had Apgar scores ≥7 at 1 minute; 5% had minor birth injuries (e.g., bruising).
Maternal Satisfaction: 1. Elective C-section: 80% satisfaction due to avoidance of labor pain; 20% dissatisfaction from prolonged recovery. 2. Vaginal Delivery: 85% satisfaction due to quicker recovery; 15% dissatisfaction due to labor pain or trauma.
Conclusion: This study concludes that both elective C-sections and vaginal deliveries have distinct advantages and risks. The choice of delivery mode should be tailored to each patient, taking into account medical indications, maternal preferences, and potential outcomes. Vaginal delivery remains the preferred method for low-risk pregnancies, while elective C-sections are valuable in specific situations.
References
- Betrán AP, et al. Global rise in cesarean section rates: An analysis of trends. The Lancet; c2021. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
- WHO. Mode of delivery and its implications for maternal and neonatal health; c2020. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
- Sandall J, et al. Short- and long-term maternal and neonatal outcomes of cesarean versus vaginal delivery; c2018. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
- Barber EL, et al. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstetrics & Gynecology; c2011. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
- Molina G, et al. Relationship between cesarean delivery and maternal mortality and morbidity. JAMA; c2015. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Cesarean section clinical guideline; c2021. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
- Clark SL, et al. Cesarean delivery rates and maternal and neonatal morbidity. Obstetrics & Gynecology; c2008. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
- Villar J, et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery. BMJ; c2007. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
How to Cite
Bachani, S., Goel, J. K., & Tarun, M. (2025). Comparison of Elective Cesarean Section and Vaginal Delivery Outcomes: A Study of 100 Patients at Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences. International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, 6(1), 12-15.
Bachani, Swati, et al. "Comparison of Elective Cesarean Section and Vaginal Delivery Outcomes: A Study of 100 Patients at Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences." International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, vol. 6, no. 1, 2025, pp. 12-15.
Bachani, S., Goel, J. K. and Tarun, M. (2025) 'Comparison of Elective Cesarean Section and Vaginal Delivery Outcomes: A Study of 100 Patients at Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences', International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, 6(1), pp. 12-15.
Bachani S, Goel JK, Tarun M. Comparison of Elective Cesarean Section and Vaginal Delivery Outcomes: A Study of 100 Patients at Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences. International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research. 2025;6(1):12-15.
Similar Articles
- Psychological Barriers to Natural Delivery: How Childbirth Anxiety Shapes Mode of Delivery and Hospital Preferences Among Najaf Women Vol 7, Issue 2 (2026)
- Preoperative Anxiety and Depression among Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section in Mosul, Iraq: A Cross-Sectional Study Vol 6, Issue 3 (2025)
- Deep Learning-Based Real-Time Data Quality Assessment and Anomaly Detection for Large-Scale Distributed Data Streams Vol 6, Issue 1 (2025)
- Classification, Importance, and Pathogenicity of Facklamia Species and Related Bacteria Vol 6, Issue 1 (2025)
- Knowledge and Attitudes towards Sexually Transmitted Infections among Medical Groups and Non-Medical Colleges at Baghdad University 2024 Vol 6, Issue 1 (2025)
Find this Article on
Google Scholar Semantic Scholar OpenAlex ResearchGate BASEA newly published article may take a few days to appear on these services.