International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research  |  e-ISSN: 2582-8940  |  Double-Blind Peer Review  |  Open Access  |  CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Current Issues
     2026:7/4

International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research

e-ISSN: 2582-8940 | Open Access

Etiological Analysis and Antibiotic Sensitivity of Vaginal Infections

Ali Younis Saleh

Department of Emergency Medicine and Immediate Aid Techniques, Mosul Medical Technical Institute, Northern Technical University, Mosul, Iraq

Article Information

Volume / Issue6 / 2 (April-June 2025)
Pages38-43
AccessOpen Access

Publication Timeline

  • Received27 February 2025
  • Accepted22 March 2025

Full Text (PDF)

Open Access - Free to Download

Download Full Article (PDF) JATS XML

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis is a common condition affecting women of reproductive age, caused by an imbalance in the vaginal microbiome. This study identifies the pathogens causing bacterial vaginosis in Nineveh and evaluates their antibiotic sensitivity to determine effective treatments. Key pathogens include Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Gardnerella vaginalis, Klebsiella spp., and Candida spp. The results highlight significant antibiotic resistance, particularly to Ampicillin and Amoxicillin, and high sensitivity to Meropenem, Ciprofloxacin, Gentamycin, and Amikacin. The vaginal microbiome plays a protective role, dominated by Lactobacillus. Bacterial vaginosis disrupts this balance, leading to overgrowth of anaerobic or facultative bacteria. It is associated with abnormal discharge, discomfort, and health complications, such as increased susceptibility to sexually transmitted infections, pregnancy-related issues, and neonatal infections. 40 vaginal swabs from women aged 20-42 years in Mosul. Swabs were analyzed microscopically and cultured on various media (e.g., blood agar). Gram staining and biochemical tests identified microbial species, confirmed with the Vitek2 system. The Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method tested 22 antibiotics for effectiveness against isolated bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus (42.5%) dominant isolate. Escherichia coli (12.5%), Gardnerella vaginalis (5%), and Klebsiella spp. (2.5%). Candida spp. (37.5%) often found in mixed infections. High resistance to Ampicillin, Amoxicillin, and Ceftazideme. Effective antibiotics include Meropenem, Ciprofloxacin, Gentamycin, and Amikacin. The study emphasizes the necessity of tailored antibiotic treatments to combat resistance and prevent complications.

Keywords

Bacterial vaginosisvaginal swabssensitivity to antibiotics

References

  1. Almeida MO, Viana MV, Cerqueira JC, Aburjaile FF, Junior AA, Azevedo V, et al. Novel insights in bacterial vaginosis etiology through genomic approaches. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 2021;93. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  2. Joseph RJ, Ser HL, Kuai YH, Tan LTH, Arasoo VJT, Letchumanan V, et al. Finding a balance in the vaginal microbiome: How do we treat and prevent the occurrence of bacterial vaginosis? Antibiotics. International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research www.allmedicaljournal.com 2021;10(6):719. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  3. Núño K, Jensen AS, O'Connor G, Houston TJ, Dikici E, Zingg JM, et al. Insights into women's health: Exploring the vaginal microbiome, quorum sensing dynamics, and therapeutic potential of quorum sensing quenchers. Molecular Aspects of Medicine. 2024; 100:101304. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  4. Naseha A. A study on evaluation of relationship between high vaginal swab culture and feto-maternal outcome in preterm rupture of membranes. International Journal of Medicine & Public Health. 2024;14(3). [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  5. Regassa MD. Impression of the effects of climate change on genetic resources and coffee (Coffea arabica L.) production. American Journal of Life Sciences. 2024;12(6):157–63. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  6. Baek JC, Jo HC, Lee SM, Park JE, Cho I, Sung JH. Prevalence of pathogens and other microorganisms in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with vulvovaginal symptoms: A retrospective study in a single institute in South Korea. Medicina. 2021;57(6):577. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  7. Shallal EN, Asker AS, Yaseen AA. Isolation and identification of Enterococcus faecium bacteria from the vaginal cavity of local ewes and study of some of their antagonistic properties against types of pathogenic bacteria. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2024 Jul;1371(7):072004. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  8. Monther H, Tawfeeq AA, Ali AA. Evaluation of Trichomonas vaginalis and Candida albicans alongside with pathogenic bacteria in Kirkuk females. NTU Journal of Pure Sciences. 2023;2(2). [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  9. Mohammed SA, Tawfeeq AA, Noraldin MY. Identification and antibiotics sensitivity of secondary bacterial infection in COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia patients in Kirkuk/Iraq. NTU Journal of Pure Sciences. 2023;2(1). [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  10. Sultan SM. Fungal urinary tract infections in pediatric age groups. NTU Journal of Pure Sciences. 2022;1(3):40–7. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  11. de Souza SV, Monteiro PB, de Moura GA, Santos NO, Fontanezi CTB, de Almeida Gomes I, et al. Vaginal microbioma and the presence of Lactobacillus spp. as interferences in female fertility: A review system. JBRA Assisted Reproduction. 2023;27(3):496. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  12. Sethi N, Narayanan V, Saaid R, Ahmad Adlan AS, Ngoi ST, Teh CSJ, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and adverse outcomes of bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2025;25(1):40. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  13. Shaker HH. Comparative study of local pathogenic bacteria in high vaginal swabs and vaginal swabs in Iraqi women. Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences. 2017;12(6):37–40. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  14. Daood II, Shareef SY, Al Jubory IH, Almukhtar SH. Evaluation and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterococcus faecalis isolated from high vagina. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences. 2020;14(1):1715–20. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  15. Kamga YM, Ngunde JP, Akoachere JFK. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and associated risk factors in pregnant women receiving antenatal care at the Kumba Health District (KHD), Cameroon. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2019;19(1):166. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  16. Al Naqshabandi AA, Ganjo AR, Abdulguader H. A retrospective study of high vaginal swap (HVS) for bacteriological and antibiogram among female patients attended to gynecology department/Rizgary teaching hospital. In: Proceeding of the First Scientific Conference on Women’s Health. Crewh\Hmu. 2018. p. 28–9. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  17. Freitas LFQ, Maia LRS, de Deus MRA, Oliveira SR, Peres AL. Frequency of microorganisms in vaginal discharges of high-risk pregnant women from a hospital in Caruaru, Pernambuco, Brazil. Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial. 2020;56. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  18. Orish VN, Ofori-Amoah J, François M, Silverius BK, Mensah EK. Microbial and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of high vaginal swab culture results in Sekondi-Takoradi Metropolis of the Western Region of Ghana: Retrospective study. European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences. 2016;2(5):45–50. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  19. Bitew A, Abebaw Y, Bekele D, Mihret A. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and associated risk factors among women complaining of genital tract infection. International Journal of Microbiology. 2017;2017. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  20. Ahmad T, Ayesha B, Jabeen S, Ismail M, Salman S, Ullah S, et al. Isolation, identification, and antibiotic susceptibility testing of microorganisms from female patients of AMC through HVS. Science International (Lahore). 2014;26(4):1581–6. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  21. Abdelaziz ZA, Ibrahim ME, Bilal NE, Hamid ME. Vaginal infections among pregnant women at Omdurman Maternity Hospital in Khartoum, Sudan. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2014;8(4):490–7. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  22. Singh S, Swain S, Das L, Das PC, Sahoo S. Isolation and characterization of organisms in high vaginal swab culture in preterm pregnancy (28–37 week). International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;5(11):3853–8. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  23. Farr A, Effendy I, Frey Tirri B, Hof H, Mayser P, Petricevic L, et al. Guideline: Vulvovaginal candidosis (AWMF 015/072, level S2k). Mycoses. 2021;64(6):583–602. [Google Scholar][Crossref]

How to Cite

Saleh, A. Y. (2025). Etiological Analysis and Antibiotic Sensitivity of Vaginal Infections. International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, 6(2), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMBHR.2025.6.2.38-43

Saleh, Ali Younis. "Etiological Analysis and Antibiotic Sensitivity of Vaginal Infections." International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, vol. 6, no. 2, 2025, pp. 38-43. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMBHR.2025.6.2.38-43.

Saleh, A. Y. (2025) 'Etiological Analysis and Antibiotic Sensitivity of Vaginal Infections', International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, 6(2), pp. 38-43. doi: 10.54660/IJMBHR.2025.6.2.38-43.

Saleh AY. Etiological Analysis and Antibiotic Sensitivity of Vaginal Infections. International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research. 2025;6(2):38-43. doi:10.54660/IJMBHR.2025.6.2.38-43

Similar Articles

Share

Find this Article on

Google Scholar Semantic Scholar OpenAlex Scilit Crossref ResearchGate BASE

A newly published article may take a few days to appear on these services.