International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research  |  e-ISSN: 2582-8940  |  Double-Blind Peer Review  |  Open Access  |  CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Current Issues
     2026:7/4

International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research

e-ISSN: 2582-8940 | Open Access

Knotless Barbed Suture Versus Conventional Polydioxanone Suture Material for Subcuticular Closure in Maxillofacial Surgeries - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Dr. Praful Lunawat, Dr. Sudhakar GVS, Dr. Pranav Asher, Dr. Abhishek Bezalwar, Dr. Sharvika Aher, Dr. Shreya Raghuwanshi, Dr. Swapnil Jain, Dr. Neha Bamane

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, SMBT Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Dhamangaon, Nashik, Maharashtra, India

Article Information

Volume / Issue7 / 3 (July-September 2026)
Pages21-27
AccessOpen Access

Publication Timeline

  • Received04 May 2026
  • Accepted03 June 2026
  • Published

Full Text (PDF)

Open Access - Free to Download

Download Full Article (PDF) JATS XML

Abstract

Background and Aim: Efficient and aesthetically pleasing wound closure is exceptionally important in the field of maxillofacial surgery. The primary aim of this study is to compare standard skin closure techniques using knotless barbed sutures versus conventional polydioxanone (PDS) suture materials.
Objectives: The primary objectives are to evaluate the efficacy of wound healing, to evaluate the rates of associated complications, and to evaluate the intraoperative time required by the surgeon to perform the suture. Secondary objectives involve evaluating suture resorption rates and patient satisfaction.
Methodology: This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial. A total of 20 patients requiring extra-oral maxillofacial incisions greater than 6 cm in length were recruited. Participants were randomly divided into two equal groups (n=10). The control group received conventional 4-0 or 5-0 PDS, and the test group received knotless barbed 4-0 or 5-0 PDS. Wound healing was evaluated using the Early Wound Healing Score (EHS) and the Landry, Turnbull, and Howley (LTH) Healing Index.
Results: The mean subcuticular closure time was significantly reduced in the barbed suture group (8.4 ± 1.2 minutes) compared to the conventional PDS group (14.6 ± 1.8 minutes) (p<0.05). Postoperative day 1 EHS showed comparable, excellent primary healing across both groups. LTH scores over subsequent follow-ups indicated no significant difference in long-term aesthetic outcomes, with zero incidences of severe dehiscence or keloid formation in the test group.
Conclusion: Knotless barbed sutures offer a highly superior intraoperative alternative by significantly reducing surgical closure time while maintaining comparable, excellent functional and esthetic postoperative healing profiles in major maxillofacial surgeries.
 

Keywords

Knotless barbed suturesPolydioxanone (PDS)Maxillofacial surgeryWound healingRandomized controlled trial

References

  1. Greenberg JA, Goldman RH. Barbed suture: a review of the technology and clinical uses in obstetrics and gynecology. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2013;6(3-4):107-15. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  2. Minozzi F, Bollero P, Unfer V, Dolci A, Galli M. The sutures in dentistry. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2009;13(3):217-26. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  3. Einarsson JI, Vellinga TT, Twijnstra AR, et al. Bidirectional barbed suture: an evaluation of safety and clinical outcomes. JSLS. 2010;14(3):381-5. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  4. Niu Q, Zheng J, Han X. No incision and tension-free vaginal sling for stress urinary incontinence: the role of knotless barbed suture. Med Hypotheses. 2018;111:8-11. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  5. Pippi R. Post-surgical clinical monitoring of soft tissue wound healing in periodontal and implant surgery. Int J Med Sci. 2017;14(8):721-8. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  6. Crosetti E, Caracciolo A, Arrigoni G, Delmastro E, Succo G. Barbed suture in oral cavity reconstruction: preliminary results. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2019;39(5):308-15. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  7. Doescher J, Emmanuel B, Greve J, Schuler PJ, Sommer F, Laban S, et al. Barbed suture in neck dissection: a randomized clinical study on efficacy, safety and aesthetic outcome. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024;281(12):6613-20. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  8. Goto S, Sakamoto T, Ganeko R, Hida K, Furukawa TA, Sakai Y. Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;4(4):CD012124. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  9. Kobayashi S, Ito M, Yamamoto S, Kinugasa Y, Kotake M, Saida Y, et al. Randomized clinical trial of skin closure by subcuticular suture or skin stapling after elective colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2015;102(5):495-500. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  10. Long T, Li C, Xu F, Xiao J. Therapeutic efficacy of platelet-rich fibrin on surgical site wound healing in patients undergoing oral carcinoma resection: a meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2024;21(3):e14386. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  11. Marini L, Rojas MA, Sahrmann P, Aghazada R, Pilloni A. Early Wound Healing Score: a system to evaluate the early healing of periodontal soft tissue wounds. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2018;48(5):274-83. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  12. Marini L, Sahrmann P, Rojas MA, Cavalcanti C, Pompa G, Papi P, et al. Early Wound Healing Score (EHS): an intra- and inter-examiner reliability study. Dent J (Basel). 2019;7(3):86. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  13. Matarasso A, Rosen AD. New and emerging uses of barbed suture technology in plastic surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33(3 Suppl):90S-95S. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  14. Peleg D, Ahmad RS, Warsof SL, Marcus-Braun N, Sciaky-Tamir Y, Ben Shachar I. A randomized clinical trial of knotless barbed suture versus conventional suture for closure of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(3):343.e1-343.e7. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  15. Raja BS, Gowda AKS, Choudhury AK, Paul S, Kalia RB. Barbed sutures for total hip and knee arthroplasty have shorter wound closure time and are cost-effective in comparison to traditional sutures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials. Indian J Orthop. 2022;56(7):1156-73. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  16. Rodriguez AB, Alhachache S, Velasquez D, Chan HL. A systematic review of oral wound healing indices. PLoS One. 2024;19(3):e0290050. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  17. Rosen AD, Guzman AM, Hartman T. Photometric analysis of absorbable barbed suture for periareolar closure in mastopexy. Plast Aesthet Res. 2016;3(9):296-301. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  18. Sah AP. Is there an advantage to knotless barbed suture in TKA wound closure? A randomized trial in simultaneous bilateral TKAs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(6):2019-27. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  19. Selvi F, Çakarer S, Can T, Kırlı Topçu SI, Palancıoğlu A, Keskin B, et al. Effects of different suture materials on tissue healing. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2016;50(2):35-42. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  20. Singal R, Kumar M, Kaushik N, Dhar S, Singh B. A comparative study of polydioxanone and nylon for abdominal wall closure with interrupted figure of eight in peritonitis cases. J Curr Surg. 2016;6(2):65-72. International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research www.allmedicaljournal.com [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  21. Huang C, Zhang C, Zhang S, Xu N, Zhang L, Lin J, et al. Subcuticular suture achieves better esthetics, healing, and similar functional outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a single-center retrospective comparative study. Front Surg. 2024;11:1473634. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  22. Al-Qurayshi Z, Hamner L, Killackey M, Friedlander P, Kandil E. The use of barbed sutures in head and neck surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(9):2027-32. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  23. Zaruby J, Gingras K, Taylor J, Maul D. An in vivo comparison of barbed suture devices and conventional monofilament sutures for cosmetic skin closure: biomechanical wound strength and histology. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;31(2):232-40. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  24. Stephens R, Tuma G, Mettu P, Kar R, Osei M, Tuma J, et al. Knotless barbed sutures in plastic surgery: a review of the literature. Eplasty. 2019;19:e12. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  25. Murtha AP, Kaplan AL, Paglia MJ, Mills BB, Feldstein ML, Ruff GL. Evaluation of a novel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(6):1769-80. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  26. Lee HJ, Byun SH, Hyun HM, Lee SY, Jeon JH, Kim SG, et al. Knotless barbed suture versus conventional polydioxanone suture material for intraoral surgical incisions: a randomized controlled trial. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2023;13(5):540-5. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  27. Singh A, Singh P, Kaur H, Sharma A. Comparison of unidirectional barbed knotless suture versus Vicryl Rapide suture for intraoral wound closure in maxillofacial trauma: a clinical study. Biomedicine. 2024;44(3):421-6. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  28. Jandali S, Low DW. Sutureless closure of maxillofacial incisions using a bidirectional barbed suture. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(3):850-2. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  29. Landry RG, Turnbull RS, Howley T. Effectiveness of benzydamine HCl in the treatment of periodontal post-surgical patients. Res Clin Forums. 1988;10:105-18. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  30. Yılmaz HB, Kural E. Lifting efficiency of barbed sutures for potential face lifting application: a parametric analysis. Polymers (Basel). 2024;16(5):1296. [Google Scholar][Crossref]

How to Cite

Lunawat, P., GVS, S., Asher, P., Bezalwar, A., Aher, S., Raghuwanshi, S., Jain, S., & Bamane, N. (2026). Knotless Barbed Suture Versus Conventional Polydioxanone Suture Material for Subcuticular Closure in Maxillofacial Surgeries - A Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, 7(3), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.3.21-27

Lunawat, Praful, et al. "Knotless Barbed Suture Versus Conventional Polydioxanone Suture Material for Subcuticular Closure in Maxillofacial Surgeries - A Randomized Controlled Trial." International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, vol. 7, no. 3, 2026, pp. 21-27. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.3.21-27.

Lunawat, P., GVS, S., Asher, P., Bezalwar, A., Aher, S., Raghuwanshi, S., Jain, S. and Bamane, N. (2026) 'Knotless Barbed Suture Versus Conventional Polydioxanone Suture Material for Subcuticular Closure in Maxillofacial Surgeries - A Randomized Controlled Trial', International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, 7(3), pp. 21-27. doi: 10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.3.21-27.

Lunawat P, GVS S, Asher P, Bezalwar A, Aher S, Raghuwanshi S, et al. Knotless Barbed Suture Versus Conventional Polydioxanone Suture Material for Subcuticular Closure in Maxillofacial Surgeries - A Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research. 2026;7(3):21-27. doi:10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.3.21-27

Similar Articles

Share

Find this Article on

Google Scholar Semantic Scholar OpenAlex Scilit Crossref ResearchGate BASE

A newly published article may take a few days to appear on these services.