International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research  |  e-ISSN: 2582-8940  |  Double-Blind Peer Review  |  Open Access  |  CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Current Issues
     2026:7/4

International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research

e-ISSN: 2582-8940 | Open Access

In-Hospital Protocal for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Evidence Regarding Neuroprotection, Mechanical Thrombectomy, and Rehabilitation Delivered by Physicians, Physiotherapists, and Nurses

Matheus Henrique Braga, Yuri Barbosa Arcanjo, Maria Luiza Harumi Takamori, Luísa Oliveira Marques de Jesus, Laura Acevedo Coutinho, João Victor Zirondi de Abreu, Thiago Augusto Rochetti Bezerra, Joel Eloi Belo Junior, Monna Maria Gonçalves Santa Rosa de Andrade

Medical Student, Max Planck University (UniMax), Indaiatuba, São Paulo, Brazil; Medical Student, University of Ribeirão Preto (UNAERP), Guarujá, São Paulo, Brazil; PhD in Medical Sciences, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil; PhD in Technological Innovation, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Professional Graduate Program in Technological Innovation, São Paulo, Brazil

Article Information

Volume / Issue7 / 3 (July-August 2026)
Pages33-44
AccessOpen Access

Publication Timeline

  • Received08 May 2026
  • Accepted07 June 2026
  • Published

Full Text (PDF)

Open Access - Free to Download

Download Full Article (PDF) JATS XML

Abstract

Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains among the leading causes of mortality and functional disability worldwide. The consolidation of mechanical thrombectomy as the standard of care for large vessel occlusions has revolutionized disease management, increasing cerebral reperfusion rates and improving clinical outcomes. However, the persistence of neurological deficits in a subset of reperfused patients highlights the need for complementary strategies focused on neuroprotection and multidisciplinary rehabilitation. In this context, structured in-hospital protocols play a fundamental role in integrating reperfusion therapies, neuroprotective measures, and functional recovery. 
Objective: To analyze the scientific evidence related to neuroprotective strategies applied to acute ischemic stroke, emphasizing their association with mechanical thrombectomy and their integration into in-hospital care and multidisciplinary rehabilitation protocols. 
Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Searches were performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, SciELO, and the Virtual Health Library (VHL) databases, including studies published between 2013 and 2026. Clinical trials, observational studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical guidelines related to mechanical thrombectomy, cerebral neuroprotection, in-hospital stroke protocols, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation were selected. After applying eligibility criteria, 75 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. 
Results: The studies demonstrated that mechanical thrombectomy constitutes the primary reperfusion strategy for patients with large vessel occlusion, presenting a significant impact on reducing functional disability. Neuroprotective measures, including the management of blood pressure, blood glucose, body temperature, and oxygenation, proved fundamental in minimizing secondary brain injury and enhancing the benefits of reperfusion. Furthermore, care in Stroke Units and the integrated practice of physicians, nurses, and physical therapists contributed to the reduction of in-hospital complications, improvement of neurological outcomes, and increased functional independence. Early mobilization, respiratory management, and structured rehabilitation programs were highlighted as essential components of post-stroke recovery. 
Conclusions: The association between mechanical thrombectomy, neuroprotective strategies, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation forms the basis of modern in-hospital protocols for acute ischemic stroke. The integration of these interventions promotes the preservation of the ischemic penumbra, reduces complications, and improves functional outcomes. The strengthening of Stroke Units and the development of novel neuroprotective approaches represent promising perspectives for optimizing the care of patients affected by this condition.
 

Keywords

Ischemic StrokeMechanical ThrombectomyNeuroprotectionIn-Hospital ProtocolStroke UnitMultidisciplinary RehabilitationNeurological Physical Therapy

References

  1. Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, et al. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:708-718. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  2. Anadani M, Alawieh A, Vargas J, et al. First pass effect and outcome after thrombectomy. Stroke. 2019;50:2140-2146. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  3. Anderson CS, Huang Y, Lindley RI, et al. Intensive blood pressure reduction with intravenous thrombolysis: ENCHANTED. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1935-1945. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  4. Bendszus M, Fiehler J, Subtil F, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke with established large infarct: TENSION. Lancet. 2023;402:1753-1763. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  5. Berge E, Whiteley W, Audebert H, et al. ESO guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Eur Stroke J. 2021;6:I-LXII. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  6. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PSS, Beumer D, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:11-20. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  7. Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G, et al. Agreed definitions and shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research. Int J Stroke. 2017;12:444-450. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  8. Bernhardt J, Langhorne P, Lindley RI, et al. Very early mobilisation after stroke: AVERT trial. Lancet. 2015;386:46-55. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  9. Bracard S, Ducrocq X, Mas JL, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:1138-1147. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  10. Broderick JP, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM, et al. Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:893-903. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  11. Campbell BCV, De Silva DA, Macleod MR, et al. Ischaemic stroke. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5:70. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  12. Campbell BCV, Khatri P. Stroke. Lancet. 2020;396:129-142. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  13. Campbell BCV, Majoie CBLM, Albers GW, et al. Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76:1295-1303. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  14. Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Churilov L, et al. Tenecteplase versus alteplase before thrombectomy. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1573-1582. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  15. Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, et al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1009-1018. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  16. Chamorro A, Blasco J, López A, et al. Complete reperfusion is required for maximal benefit after thrombectomy. Stroke. 2017;48:1848-1854. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  17. Chamorro Á, Dirnagl U, Urra X, Planas AM. Neuroprotection in acute stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:869-881. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  18. Ciccone A, Valvassori L, Nichelatti M, et al. Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:904-913. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  19. Dammavalam V, Aghaebrahim A, Rai AT. Neuroprotection during thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a review. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:891. International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research www.allmedicaljournal.com [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  20. Dirnagl U, Endres M. Found in translation: preclinical stroke research predicts human pathophysiology. Stroke. 2014;45:1510-1518. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  21. Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, et al. Effect of treatment delay on alteplase in acute ischemic stroke. Lancet. 2014;384:1929-1935. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  22. Fischer U, Kaesmacher J, Strbian D, et al. Thrombectomy alone versus intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy: SWIFT DIRECT. Lancet. 2022;400:104-115. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  23. Gittler M, Davis AM. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery. JAMA. 2018;319:820-821. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  24. Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, et al. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1019-1030. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  25. Goyal M, Fargen KM, Turk AS, et al. 2C or not 2C: defining successful reperfusion after thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:83-86. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  26. Goyal M, Menon BK, Hill MD, Demchuk A. Consistently achieving computed tomography to endovascular reperfusion below 90 minutes. Stroke. 2014;45:e252-e256. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  27. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta -analysis. Lancet. 2016;387:1723-1731. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  28. Hill MD, Goyal M, Menon BK, et al. Nerinetide for acute ischaemic stroke: ESCAPE-NA1 trial. Lancet. 2020;395:878-887. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  29. Huo X, Ma G, Tong X, et al. Trial of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarct: ANGEL-ASPECT. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:1272-1283. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  30. Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, et al. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2296-2306. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  31. Kidwell CS, Jahan R, Gornbein J, et al. A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:914-923. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  32. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377:1693-1702. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  33. Langhorne P, Collier JM, Bate PJ, et al. Very early versus delayed mobilisation after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;CD006187. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  34. Lapergue B, Blanc R, Gory B, et al. Effect of endovascular contact aspiration vs stent retriever on revascularization. JAMA. 2017;318:443-452. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  35. LeCouffe NE, Kappelhof M, Treurniet KM, et al. A randomized trial of intravenous alteplase before endovascular treatment. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1833-1844. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  36. Liebeskind DS, Bracard S, Guillemin F, et al. eTICI reperfusion: defining success in endovascular stroke therapy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11:433-438. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  37. Martins SCO, Mont’Alverne FJA, Rebello LC, et al. Thrombectomy for stroke in the public health care system of Brazil. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2316-2326. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  38. Maus V, Behme D, Kabbasch C, et al. Maximizing first-pass complete reperfusion with thrombectomy. Clin Neuroradiol. 2018;28:327-338. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  39. Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Elsner B. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;CD002840. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  40. Menon BK, Buck BH, Singh N, et al. Intravenous tenecteplase compared with alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: AcT trial. Lancet. 2022;400:161-169. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  41. Meretoja A, Keshtkaran M, Saver JL, et al. Stroke thrombolysis: save a minute, save a day. Stroke. 2014;45:1053-1058. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  42. Minelli C, Bazan R, Pedatella MT, et al. Brazilian Academy of Neurology practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2022;80:753-774. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  43. Mistry EA, Mistry AM, Nakawah MO, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy outcomes with and without intravenous thrombolysis. Stroke. 2017;48:2450-2456. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  44. Mitchell PJ, Yan B, Churilov L, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy versus bridging thrombolysis: DIRECT-SAFE. Lancet. 2022;400:116-125. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  45. Mocco J, Zaidat OO, von Kummer R, et al. Aspiration thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone. Stroke. 2016;47:2331-2338. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  46. Muir KW, Ford GA, Messow CM, et al. Endovascular therapy for acute ischaemic stroke: PISTE trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017;88:38-44. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  47. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Stroke rehabilitation in adults. NICE guideline NG236. London: NICE; 2023. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  48. Neuhaus AA, Couch Y, Hadley G, Buchan AM. Neuroprotection in stroke: the importance of collaboration and reproducibility. Brain. 2017;140:2079-2092. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  49. Nogueira RG, Frei D, Kirmani JF, et al. Safety and efficacy of 3D stent retriever thrombectomy: Trevo Registry. Stroke. 2018;49:1711-1717. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  50. Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, et al. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:11-21. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  51. Oliveira AJF, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Einstein. 2022;20:eRW6642. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  52. Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P, et al. Physical rehabilitation approaches for recovery after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;CD001920. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  53. Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, et al. 2015 AHA/ASA focused update on endovascular treatment. Stroke. 2015;46:3020-3035. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  54. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update. Stroke. 2019;50:e344-e418. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  55. Renú A, Millán M, San Román L, et al. Intra-arterial alteplase after successful thrombectomy: CHOICE trial. JAMA. 2022;327:826-835. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  56. Ribo M, Molina CA, Cobo E, et al. Association between time to reperfusion and outcome after thrombectomy. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73:190-196. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  57. Royal College of Physicians. National Clinical Guideline for Stroke. 7th ed. London: RCP; 2023. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  58. Sarraj A, Hassan AE, Abraham MG, et al. Trial of endovascular thrombectomy for large ischemic strokes: SELECT2. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:1259-1271. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  59. Savitz SI, Baron JC, Yenari MA, Sanossian N, Fisher M. Reconsidering neuroprotection in the reperfusion era. Stroke. 2017;48:3413-3419. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  60. Saver JL. Time is brain—quantified. Stroke. 2006;37:263-266. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  61. Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, et al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous tPA. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2285-2295. International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research www.allmedicaljournal.com [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  62. Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient stroke unit care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;CD000197. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  63. Suzuki K, Matsumaru Y, Takeuchi M, et al. Effect of mechanical thrombectomy without vs with intravenous thrombolysis: SKIP trial. JAMA. 2021;325:244-253. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  64. Thomalla G, Simonsen CZ, Boutitie F, et al. MRI-guided thrombolysis for stroke with unknown onset time. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:611-622. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  65. Turc G, Bhogal P, Fischer U, et al. ESO–ESMINT guidelines on mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11:535-538. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  66. Turk AS, Siddiqui A, Fifi JT, et al. Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy: COMPASS trial. Lancet. 2019;393:998-1008. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  67. Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? PLoS One. 2014;9:e87987. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  68. Wang Y, Xu J, Zhao Z, Yang R, Zhou X, Yang Z. Mechanism-informed neuroprotection in acute ischemic stroke treated with thrombectomy. Front Pharmacol. 2026;17:1843513. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  69. Wesley MJ, et al. Neuroprotective agents with reperfusion therapies in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review. 2025. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  70. Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery. Stroke. 2016;47:e98-e169. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  71. Yang P, Song L, Zhang Y, et al. Intensive blood pressure control after thrombectomy: ENCHANTED2/MT. Lancet. 2022;400:1585-1596. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  72. Yang P, Zhang Y, Zhang L, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy with or without intravenous alteplase: DIRECT-MT. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1981-1993. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  73. Yoshimura S, Sakai N, Yamagami H, et al. Endovascular therapy for acute stroke with large ischemic region: RESCUE-Japan LIMIT. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:1303-1313. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  74. Zaidat OO, Castonguay AC, Linfante I, et al. First pass effect: a new measure for stroke thrombectomy. Stroke. 2018;49:660-666. [Google Scholar][Crossref]

How to Cite

Braga, M. H., Arcanjo, Y. B., Takamori, M. L. H., Jesus, L. O. M. D., Coutinho, L. A., Abreu, J. V. Z. D., Bezerra, T. A. R., Junior, J. E. B., & Andrade, M. M. G. S. R. D. (2026). In-Hospital Protocal for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Evidence Regarding Neuroprotection, Mechanical Thrombectomy, and Rehabilitation Delivered by Physicians, Physiotherapists, and Nurses. International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, 7(3), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.3.33-44

Braga, Matheus Henrique, et al. "In-Hospital Protocal for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Evidence Regarding Neuroprotection, Mechanical Thrombectomy, and Rehabilitation Delivered by Physicians, Physiotherapists, and Nurses." International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, vol. 7, no. 3, 2026, pp. 33-44. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.3.33-44.

Braga, M. H., Arcanjo, Y. B., Takamori, M. L. H., Jesus, L. O. M. D., Coutinho, L. A., Abreu, J. V. Z. D., Bezerra, T. A. R., Junior, J. E. B. and Andrade, M. M. G. S. R. D. (2026) 'In-Hospital Protocal for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Evidence Regarding Neuroprotection, Mechanical Thrombectomy, and Rehabilitation Delivered by Physicians, Physiotherapists, and Nurses', International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, 7(3), pp. 33-44. doi: 10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.3.33-44.

Braga MH, Arcanjo YB, Takamori MLH, Jesus LOMD, Coutinho LA, Abreu JVZD, et al. In-Hospital Protocal for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Evidence Regarding Neuroprotection, Mechanical Thrombectomy, and Rehabilitation Delivered by Physicians, Physiotherapists, and Nurses. International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research. 2026;7(3):33-44. doi:10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.3.33-44

Similar Articles

Share

Find this Article on

Google Scholar Semantic Scholar OpenAlex Scilit Crossref ResearchGate BASE

A newly published article may take a few days to appear on these services.