International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research  |  e-ISSN: 2582-8940  |  Double-Blind Peer Review  |  Open Access  |  CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Current Issues
     2026:7/4

International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research

e-ISSN: 2582-8940 | Open Access

SpO2/FiO2 versus PaO2/FiO2 Ratio for Assessing Oxygenation in Critically Ill Children Requiring Respiratory Support: A Prospective Observational Study in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Dr Sanjog K Goel, Dr Yogesh Kumar Goel, Dr Bharat Gupta, Dr Ashish Chauhan, Dr Swati Jain

3rd Year PG Resident ,Department of Pediatrics, Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India; Professor and Head ,Department of Pediatrics, Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India; Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics,Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences,Hapur,Uttar Pradesh , India; Senior Resident, Department of Pediatrics,Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences,Hapur,Uttar Pradesh , India

Article Information

Volume / Issue7 / 2 (April-June 2026)
Pages265-268
AccessOpen Access

Publication Timeline

  • Received09 April 2026
  • Accepted08 May 2026
  • Published

Full Text (PDF)

Open Access - Free to Download

Download Full Article (PDF) JATS XML

Abstract

Background: The PaO2/FiO2 (PF) ratio derived from arterial blood gas analysis is the reference standard for grading oxygenation in critically ill children, but repeated arterial sampling is invasive and frequently impractical in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). The SpO2/FiO2 (SF) ratio obtained from pulse oximetry offers a non-invasive, continuous alternative.
Aim: To compare the SF and PF ratios and evaluate the SF ratio as a surrogate marker of oxygenation, disease severity and outcome in critically ill children requiring respiratory support.
Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled 125 children aged 2 months to 16 years requiring respiratory support (invasive ventilation, non-invasive ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula) in the PICU of a tertiary care hospital over 24 months. SpO2, PaO2 and FiO2 were recorded simultaneously at admission and again at clinical deterioration or 24 hours, whichever was earlier. SF and PF ratios were calculated and compared across ARDS severity, respiratory support modality and clinical outcome. Analysis was performed in SPSS v29.0; p < 0.05 was significant.
Results: Mean age was 4.6 ± 4.4 years; bronchiolitis (23.2%) and pneumonia (12.0%) were the commonest diagnoses. SF and PF ratios fell in parallel with increasing ARDS severity at admission (non-ARDS SF 319.1/PF 393.1 vs severe SF 193.9/PF 209.5; p < 0.001 for both) and at 24 hours (p < 0.001). Both ratios were lowest in mechanically ventilated children and in non-survivors (admission SF 203.7/PF 202.0 in those who died vs SF 255.2/PF 276.5 in those discharged; p = 0.013 and 0.008). The prognostic separation widened at 24 hours (PF p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The SF ratio paralleled the PF ratio across severity, support modality and outcome, supporting its use as a reliable non-invasive surrogate that may reduce arterial sampling and aid early risk stratification in the PICU.
 

Keywords

SpO2/FiO2 ratioPaO2/FiO2 ratiopediatric ARDSpulse oximetryoxygenation indexpediatric intensive care unit

References

  1. Lobete C, Medina A, Rey C, Mayordomo-Colunga J, Concha A, Menéndez S. Correlation of oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio with PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio in a heterogeneous sample of critically ill children. J Crit Care. 2013;28(4):538.e1-538.e7. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  2. Singla S, Bhargava S, Pooni PA, et al. Comparison of SpO2- with PaO2-based indices of oxygenation in children with respiratory failure. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2024. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1782523. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  3. Hammer J. Acute respiratory failure in children. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2013;14(2):64-9. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  4. Rathi S, Kakkar R, Chawla S, Khanduri S, Kaushik RM, Kaushik R. Utility of SpO2/FiO2 ratio and PaO2/FiO2 ratio in the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a comparative study. Trop Doct. 2025;55(3):217-22. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  5. Lodha R, Kabra SK, Pandey RM. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: experience at a tertiary care hospital. Indian Pediatr. 2001;38(10):1154-9. International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research www.allmedicaljournal.com [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  6. Almossawi O, Friend A, Palla L, et al. Is there a sex difference in mortality rates in paediatric intensive care units? A systematic review. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1225684. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  7. Ishaque S, Bibi N, Dawood ZS, et al. Burden of respiratory disease in pediatric intensive care unit: experience from a PICU of a tertiary care center in Pakistan. Crit Care Res Pract. 2024;2024:6704727. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  8. BinDahman HA. Mortality pattern and risk factors in pediatric ICU: a retrospective study at Mukalla Maternal and Childhood Hospital in Yemen (2021-2024). J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2025;15(1):99. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  9. Heneghan JA, Reeder RW, Dean JM, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of critical illness in children with feeding and respiratory technology dependence. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20(5):417-25. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  10. Aijaz A, Majeed A, Anwar-ul-Haque. Pattern and burden of respiratory diseases in pediatric intensive care unit. Prof Med J. 2025;32(6):658-63. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  11. Pelletier JH, Maholtz DE, Hanson CM, et al. Respiratory support practices for bronchiolitis in the pediatric intensive care unit. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(5):e2410746. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  12. Kang JM, Lee J, Kim YK, et al. Pediatric intensive care unit admission due to respiratory syncytial virus: retrospective multicenter study. Pediatr Int. 2019;61(7):688-96. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  13. Maneenil G, Premprat N, Janjindamai W, Dissaneevate S, Phatigomet M, Thatrimontrichai A. Correlation and prediction of oxygen index from oxygen saturation index in neonates with acute respiratory failure. Am J Perinatol. 2024;41(2). doi: 10.1055/a-1673-5251. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  14. Huang X, Xu L, Pei Y, et al. The association between oxygenation status at 24 h after diagnosis of pulmonary ARDS and 30-day mortality among pediatric oncological patients. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:805264. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  15. DesPrez K, McNeil JB, Wang C, Bastarache JA, Shaver CM, Ware LB. Oxygenation saturation index predicts clinical outcomes in ARDS. Chest. 2017;152(6):1151-8. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  16. Kim SY, Kim B, Choi SH, et al. Oxygenation index in the first 24 hours after the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome as a surrogate metric for risk stratification in children. Acute Crit Care. 2018;33(4):222-9. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  17. Yehya N, Thomas NJ, Khemani RG. Risk stratification using oxygenation in the first 24 hours of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(4):619-24. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  18. Bilan N, Dastranji A, Behbahani AG. Comparison of the SpO2/FiO2 ratio and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2015;7(1):28-31. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  19. Lohano PD, Baloch SH, Gowa MA, Raza SJ, Soomro L, Nawaz H. Correlation between SpO2/FiO2 and PaO2/FiO2 in detection and risk stratification of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cureus. 2021;13(9):e18353. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  20. Beniwal R, Batra P, Bhaskar V, Harit D. SpO2/FiO2 and PaO2/FiO2 for predicting intensive care admission in wheezy children: an observational study. Indian Pediatr. 2024;61(7):632-6. [Google Scholar][Crossref]

How to Cite

Goel, S. K., Goel, Y. K., Gupta, B., Chauhan, A., & Jain, S. (2026). SpO2/FiO2 versus PaO2/FiO2 Ratio for Assessing Oxygenation in Critically Ill Children Requiring Respiratory Support: A Prospective Observational Study in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, 7(2), 265-268. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.2.265-268

Goel, Sanjog K, et al. "SpO2/FiO2 versus PaO2/FiO2 Ratio for Assessing Oxygenation in Critically Ill Children Requiring Respiratory Support: A Prospective Observational Study in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit." International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, vol. 7, no. 2, 2026, pp. 265-268. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.2.265-268.

Goel, S. K., Goel, Y. K., Gupta, B., Chauhan, A. and Jain, S. (2026) 'SpO2/FiO2 versus PaO2/FiO2 Ratio for Assessing Oxygenation in Critically Ill Children Requiring Respiratory Support: A Prospective Observational Study in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit', International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, 7(2), pp. 265-268. doi: 10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.2.265-268.

Goel SK, Goel YK, Gupta B, Chauhan A, Jain S. SpO2/FiO2 versus PaO2/FiO2 Ratio for Assessing Oxygenation in Critically Ill Children Requiring Respiratory Support: A Prospective Observational Study in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research. 2026;7(2):265-268. doi:10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.2.265-268

Similar Articles

Share

Find this Article on

Google Scholar Semantic Scholar OpenAlex Scilit Crossref ResearchGate BASE

A newly published article may take a few days to appear on these services.