International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research  |  e-ISSN: 2582-8940  |  Double-Blind Peer Review  |  Open Access  |  CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Current Issues
     2026:7/4

International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research

e-ISSN: 2582-8940 | Open Access

Multiagent AI Systems in Healthcare: A Comparative Study of Nigerian and Russian Healthcare Systems

Article Information

Volume / Issue7 / 1 (January-March 2026)
Pages100-106
AccessOpen Access

Publication Timeline

  • Received18 November 2025
  • Accepted20 December 2025
  • Published

Full Text (PDF)

Open Access - Free to Download

Download Full Article (PDF) JATS XML

Abstract

Multi-Agent AI systems (MAS) have transformative healthcare potentials. However, as a result of different approaches, policies, infrastructural and socio-political challenges, varied applications of MAS have appeared across several countries. This mixed-methods comparative study of MAS application in Nigeria (Lagos) and Russia (Moscow) dives into differing issues such as infrastructural preparedness, legal policies and actual implementation. Whereas Moscow has an advanced healthcare system that employs MAS in telemedicine and preventive medicine, surgeries (such as Da Vinci systems), Lagos implements MAS in diagnosis and EHR (electronic health record system) integration, which could be referred to as foundational applications. This study highlights main adoption challenges, including funding hurdles, gaps in operability and sociocultural resistance, while presenting solutions for improvement- such as FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) standards in Nigeria and federated learning pilots in Russia. The study further dives into on how government policies, digital literacy, and local innovation ecosystems shape the effectiveness of MAS adoption in both settings. Lagos and Moscow were chosen as case studies as they are national health and economic innovation hubs, and both locations have remarkable models to emulate for new e-healthcare economies. By reviewing outcomes (efficiency, reduced errors) with qualitative insights (methods), this study could prove a suitable blueprint for implementing and optimizing MAS across a plethora of healthcare systems, with a view to a broader African and Eurasian adoption.

References

  1. Abah VO. Poor health care access in Nigeria: A function of fundamental misconceptions and misconstruction of the health system. In: Önal AE, editor. Healthcare access – new threats, new approaches. London: IntechOpen; 2023. p. 1 –16. Available fr om: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.108530 [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  2. Dada EA, Eyeregba ME, Mokogwu C, Olorunyomi TD. AI-driven policy optimization for strengthening economic resilience and inclusive growth in Nigeria. IRE J. 2024 Dec;8(6):201–210. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  3. DigitalPolicyAlert. Russia: Adopted amendments to the national strategy for the development of artificial International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research www.allmedicaljournal.com intelligence in Russia until 2030 (Decree No. 124). 2024 Feb 15. Available from: https://digitalpolicyalert.org/event/17715-adopted-amendments-to-the-national-strategy-for-the-development-of-artificial-intelligence-in-russia-until-2030 [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  4. World Bank. Data for Nigeria, lower middle income. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2025. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/?locations=NG-XN [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  5. Omiyi D, Arubuola E, Chilaka M, Rahman Jabin MS. Migration of health workers and its impacts on the Nigerian health care sector: Protocol for a scoping review. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025;14:e62726. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/62726 [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  6. World Bank. Nigeria – health expenditure (% of GDP). Washington (DC): World Bank; 2022. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.CHEX.G D.ZS?locations=NG [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  7. Gusev AV, Vladzymyrskyy AV, Sharova DE, Arzamasov KM, Khramov AE. Evolution of research and development in the field of artificial intelligence technologies for healthcare in the Russian Federation: Results of 2021. Digit Diagn. 2022;3(3):178–194. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17816/DD107367 [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  8. Shevtsova D, Ahmed A, Boot IWA, Sanges C, Hudecek M, Jacobs JJL, et al. Trust in and acceptance of artificial intelligence applications in medicine: Mixed methods study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2024;11:e47031. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/47031 [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  9. Statista. Russia: Current healthcare spending per capita 2014–2029. 2025. Available from: https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1148860/healthcare-spending-per-capita-forecast-in-russia [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  10. GxP News. In Russia, over 40% of healthcare IT solutions incorporate AI; they account for about half of all investments in digital developments. 2024 May. Available from: https://gxpnews.net/en/2024/05/in-russia-over-40-of-healthcare-it-solutions-incorporate-ai/ [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  11. Grigorieva NS, Demkina AE, Korobeynikova AN. Digitalization in the Russian healthcare: Barriers to digital maturity. Popul Econ. 2024;8(1):1–14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.8.e111793 [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  12. Sazonova YV. Legal regulation of telemedicine in Russia: Problems and prospects. Bull Natl Med Res Cent Ther Prev Med. 2020;20(6):402–407. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  13. Panfilova VV. Telemedicine in Russian healthcare: Organizational and legal issues. Public Health Healthc. 2019;2(1):45–52. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  14. Luzolo PH, Elrawashdeh Z, Tchappi IH, Galland S, Outay F. Combining multi-agent systems and artificial intelligence of things: Technical challenges and gains. Internet Things. 2024;28:101364. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101364 [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  15. Galster M, Weyns D, Tofan D, Michalik B, Avgeriou P. Variability in software systems—A systematic literature review. IEEE Trans Softw Eng. 2014;40(3):282–306. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2013.56 [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  16. Bassam AN, Hussain SA, Qaraghuli AA, Khan J, Sumesh EP, Lavanya V. IoT-based wearable device to monitor the signs of quarantined remote patients of COVID-19. Inform Med Unlocked. 2021;24:100588. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2021.100588 [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  17. Thangaraj M, Dhiman G, Shankar K, Kumar R. AIoT: A review on artificial intelligence of things applications in smart healthcare. Comput Commun. 2021;167:231–247. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  18. Borkowski AA, Ben-Ari A. Multi-agent AI systems in healthcare: Technical and clinical analysis. Preprints.org; 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.0182.v1 [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  19. Alves F, Rocha AMAC, Pereira AI, Leitão P. Multi-agent system architecture for distributed home health care information systems. In: Technological innovation for applied AI systems. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 295– 303. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78288-7_28 [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  20. TechCabal. Helium Health is digitising African healthcare. Lagos: TechCabal; 2023. Available from: https://techcabal.com/ [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  21. British International Investment. Investing in health tech in Africa: MDaaS Global case study. London: BII; 2023. Available from: https://www.bii.co.uk/ [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  22. Abdulkadir DU. Adoption of AI in Nigeria for national development: Challenges and complexities. In: Proc 3rd Int Conf ICT for National Development and Its Sustainability (ICT4NDS 2024); 2024. p. 243–250. Available from: https://repository.run.edu.ng/server/api/core/bitstreams/bbebe6fd-d35c-4586-80ee-9c367d033df7/content [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  23. eHealth Africa. Digital health infrastructure and resilience in Nigeria: Overcoming connectivity and power challenges. Kano: eHealth Africa; 2022. Available from: https://www.ehealthafrica.org/ [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  24. Lagos State Ministry of Health. Lagos State Ministry of Health website. 2024. Available from: https://lagosministryofhealth.org/2024/12/ [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  25. Helium Health. Helium Health case study: Digital health innovations improving diagnosis time and maternal health tracking. Lagos: Helium Health; 2021. Available from: https://www.heliumhealth.com/ [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  26. Zhuravlev M, Blagoveshchenskaya O. Current state and COVID-19 lessons. Legal Issues Digit Age Telemed. 2020;2(2):93–143. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17323/2713-2749.2020.2.93.143 [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  27. robot-davinci.ru. Information for patients: Risks of da Vinci robotic surgery. 2025. Available from: https://robot-davinci.ru/ [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  28. Evercare. Digital health and telemedicine companies in Russia. Moscow: Evercare; 2020. Available from: https://evercare.ru/ [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  29. Roche Russia. Digital platforms for remote patient monitoring. Moscow: Roche; 2023. Available from: https://med.roche.ru/ [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  30. Sberbank. Sber Health report: Impact of chronic disease monitoring and drug inventory optimization. Moscow: Sberbank; 2023. Available from: https://www.sberbank.com/ [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  31. Moscow Central Clinic. Drug inventory restocking efficiency report. Moscow; 2021. Available from: https://www.mosgorzdrav.ru/ [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  32. Almazov National Medical Research Centre. Robotic aortofemoral bypass surgery using the da Vinci system. St. Petersburg; 2025. Available from: https://almazovcentre.ru/ [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  33. Moscow City Health Department. Robotic surgeries success rates in prostatectomy. Moscow; 2022. Available from: https://mosgorzdrav.ru/ [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  34. Skolkovo Foundation. AI health ventures annual growth International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research www.allmedicaljournal.com report. Moscow; 2023. Available from: https://sk.ru/ [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  35. Shishkin S, Sheiman I, Vlassov V, Potapchik E, Sazhina S. Structural changes in the Russian health care system: Do they match European trends? Health Econ Rev. 2022;12(1):29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-022-00373-z [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  36. Saripalle R, Runyan C, Russell M. Patient empowerment through personal health records and HL7 FHIR. J Biomed Inform. 2019;94:103183. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103183 [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  37. Healthcare IT Report. Digital health in Russia: FHIS readiness. Moscow; 2023. Available from: https://www.hit-report.ru/ [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  38. GSMA. FHIR for African healthcare. London: GSM Association; 2022. Available from: https://www.gsma.com/ [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  39. Adegbaye TA. Realising the benefits of digital health implementation in a middle-income country: Applying Theory of Change in Nigerian primary care. London: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine; 2021. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  40. Persse JF. Digital health: People, processes and technology. In: HIMSS Future Care. Chicago (IL): HIMSS; 2016. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  41. NOIPolls. National survey on artificial intelligence and healthcare in Nigeria. Abuja: NOIPolls; 2023. [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  42. Dayan I, Roth HR, Zhong A, Harouni A, Gentili A, Abidin AZ, et al. Federated learning for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Nat Med. 2021;27(10):1735–1743. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01506-3 [Google Scholar][Crossref]
  43. State Duma of the Russian Federation. Draft federal law No. 456 on patient consent protocols and transparency in medical AI systems. Moscow: State Duma; 2024. [Google Scholar][Crossref]

How to Cite

Idogho, O. P., Koshechkin, K., Ugwu, D. C., Abraham, E. F., Abubakar, S., Monago, C. K., Aifuobhokhan, J., & Udoh, O. V. (2026). Multiagent AI Systems in Healthcare: A Comparative Study of Nigerian and Russian Healthcare Systems. International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, 7(1), 100-106. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.1.100-106

Idogho, Obaro Princewill, et al. "Multiagent AI Systems in Healthcare: A Comparative Study of Nigerian and Russian Healthcare Systems." International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, vol. 7, no. 1, 2026, pp. 100-106. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.1.100-106.

Idogho, O. P., Koshechkin, K., Ugwu, D. C., Abraham, E. F., Abubakar, S., Monago, C. K., Aifuobhokhan, J. and Udoh, O. V. (2026) 'Multiagent AI Systems in Healthcare: A Comparative Study of Nigerian and Russian Healthcare Systems', International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, 7(1), pp. 100-106. doi: 10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.1.100-106.

Idogho OP, Koshechkin K, Ugwu DC, Abraham EF, Abubakar S, Monago CK, et al. Multiagent AI Systems in Healthcare: A Comparative Study of Nigerian and Russian Healthcare Systems. International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research. 2026;7(1):100-106. doi:10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.1.100-106

Share

Find this Article on

Google Scholar Semantic Scholar OpenAlex Scilit Crossref ResearchGate BASE

A newly published article may take a few days to appear on these services.