<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJMABHR</journal-id>
<journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>IJMABHR</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2582-8940</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Anfo Publication House</publisher-name></publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">478</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.2.151-160</article-id>
<title-group><article-title>Explainable Cox‑Ridge Survival Modeling with SHAP for Early Risk Stratification After Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Analysis</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Abbas</surname><given-names>Zaffar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Muhammad</surname><given-names>Imran</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib>
<aff id="aff1"><label>1</label>Qingdao University, China</aff>
<aff id="aff2"><label>2</label>Organ Transplantation Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao, Shandong, China</aff>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub"><day>17</day><month>05</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
<volume>7</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>151</fpage>
<lpage>160</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>03</month><year>2026</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></date>
</history>
<permissions><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/?utm"><license-p>CC BY-NC-SA 4.0</license-p></license></permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://www.allmedicaljournal.com/article/478/explainable-cox-ridge-survival-modeling-with-shap-for-early-risk-stratification-after-transarterial"/>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://www.allmedicaljournal.com/article/478/download"/>
<abstract><p>Purpose: The aim of this study is to create and validate an actionable interpretable survival model of hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving Transarterial chemoembolization, by combining clinical data and CT radiomic data under a SHAP framework.
Materials and Methods: In the analysis, the publicly available WAW-TACE cohort (N = 233; 170 deaths, cadaveric data access group) was used. Of the 3,339 radiomics features, the 100 with the highest variance were selected. Following the preprocessing and one-hot encoding (features that did not converge were assigned non-significant p-values) and based on univariate Cox regression analysis, the 30 top- ranked predictors were selected. To perform the survival model, a ridge-penalized Cox proportional hazards with an α = 20, and 5-fold cross validation, was used to fit 70% of the data and the remaining 30% was used to evaluate the model. The performance of the model was evaluated using the Harrell&apos;s C-index and a time dependent AUC (Uno et al., 2013). 12-month calibration was performed along with an optimism correction (200 bootstrap iterations). Interpretability of the survival model was done using SHAP (Kernel Explainer).
Results: The test C-index was 0.654 (95% CI: 0.592–0.698). The internal bootstrap corrected C-index, reflecting a correction for optimism at a sample out of the distribution, was 0.728. The time- dependent AUC was noted at 0.874 (6 months), 0.803 (12 months), 0.663 (24 months), and 0.634 (36 months). The top predictors included serum albumin, number of lesions, and being female. The trained model had a higher C-index compared to the Hepatocellular carcinoma, Albumin, and Prothrombin Time-based Assessment of Liver Function and Risk of Death (HAP) score (C-index: 0.544) and the Assessment of Liver Function and Risk of Death (ALBI-TAE) (C-index: 0.624). Risk separation was significant and improved using the median risk threshold. The SHAP analysis presented plausible feature interactions and provided exogenous explanations.
Conclusion: The development of an explainable Cox-ridge model has established significant short-term survival prediction after TACE for HCC. The SHAP-based explanations provided for the model suggest that it can be incorporated into clinical decision support pathways with early clinical triage to facilitate access to systemic therapy.
 </p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author"><kwd>Hepatocellular carcinoma</kwd><kwd>Transarterial chemoembolization</kwd><kwd>Radiomics</kwd><kwd>Cox proportional hazards model</kwd><kwd>SHAP explainable AI</kwd></kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<back><ref-list><title>References</title>
<ref id="R1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Villanueva A. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(15):1450-62.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115-32.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Llovet JM, Kelley RK, Villanueva A, Singal AG, Pikarsky E, Roayaie S, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):6.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Kudo M, Ueshima K, Ikeda M, Torimura T, Tanabe N, Aikata H, et al. Randomised, multicentre prospective trial of transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) plus sorafenib as compared with TACE alone in patients with International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research www.allmedicaljournal.com hepatocellular carcinoma: TACTICS trial. Gut. 2020;69(8):1492-501.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, Galle PR, Ducreux M, Kim TY, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(20):1894-905.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Llovet JM, Singal AG, Villanueva A, Finn RS, Kudo M, Galle PR, et al. Prognostic and predictive factors in patients with advanced HCC and elevated alpha-fetoprotein treated with ramucirumab in two randomized phase III trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28(11):2297-305.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Izzo C, Annunziata M, Melara G, Sciorio R, Dallio M, Masarone M, et al. The role of resveratrol in liver disease: a comprehensive review from in vitro to clinical trials. Nutrients. 2021;13(3):933.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Li G, Li X, Mahmud I, Ysaguirre J, Fekry B, Wang S, et al. Interfering with lipid metabolism through targeting CES1 sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma for chemotherapy. JCI Insight. 2023;8(2):e163624.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Ishwaran H, Kogalur UB, Blackstone EH, Lauer MS. Random survival forests. Ann Appl Stat. 2008;2(3):841-60.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Katzman JL, Shaham U, Cloninger A, Bates J, Jiang T, Kluger Y. DeepSurv: personalized treatment recommender system using a Cox proportional hazards deep neural network. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):24.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Watson DS, Krutzinna J, Bruce IN, Griffiths CE, McInnes IB, Barnes MR, et al. Clinical applications of machine learning algorithms: beyond the black box. BMJ. 2019;364:l886.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):44-56.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Lundberg S, Lee SI. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Guyon I, Luxburg UV, Bengio S, Wallach H, Fergus R, Vishwanathan S, et al., editors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30. New York (NY): Curran Associates Inc.; 2017. p. 4765-74.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Lundberg SM, Erion G, Chen H, DeGrave A, Prutkin JM, Nair B, et al. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nat Mach Intell. 2020;2(1):56-67.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Miotto R, Wang F, Wang S, Jiang X, Dudley JT. Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges. Brief Bioinform. 2018;19(6):1236-46.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, Van Stiphout RG, Granton P, et al. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(4):441-6.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology. 2016;278(2):563-77.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Aerts HJWL, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RTH, Parmar C, Grossmann P, Carvalho S, et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4006.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Rizzo S, Botta F, Raimondi S, Origgi D, Fanciullo C, Morganti AG, et al. Radiomics: the facts and the challenges of image analysis. Eur Radiol Exp. 2018;2(1):36.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Peduzzi P, Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48(12):1503-10.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Parmar C, Grossmann P, Bussink J, Lambin P, Aerts HJWL. Machine learning methods for quantitative radiomic biomarkers. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13087.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Pruinelli L, Balakrishnan K, Ma S, Li Z, Wall A, Lai JC, et al. Transforming liver transplant allocation with artificial intelligence and machine learning: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025;25(1):98.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15(4):361-87.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Uno H, Cai T, Tian L, Wei LJ. Evaluating prediction rules for t-year survivors with censored regression models. J Am Stat Assoc. 2007;102(478):527-37.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York (NY): Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Molnar C. Interpretable machine learning. 2nd ed. Munich: Leanpub; 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Molnar C, Freiesleben T, König G, Herbinger J, Reisinger T, Casalicchio G, et al. Relating the partial dependence plot and permutation feature importance to the data generating process. In: World Conference on Explainable Artificial Intelligence; 2023. Cham: Springer; 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Llovet JM, Castet F, Heikenwalder M, Maini MK, Mazzaferro V, Pinato DJ, et al. Immunotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022;19(3):151-72.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Johnson PJ, Berhane S, Kagebayashi C, Satomura S, Teng M, Reeves HL, et al. Assessment of liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a new evidence-based approach—the ALBI grade. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(6):550-8.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Zhu D, Ciais P, Krinner G, Maignan F, Jornet Puig A, Hugelius G. Controls of soil organic matter on soil thermal dynamics in the northern high latitudes. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3172.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Kocher M, Ruge MI, Galldiks N, Lohmann P. Applications of radiomics and machine learning for radiotherapy of malignant brain tumors. Strahlenther Onkol. 2020;196(10):856-67.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Kelly CJ, Karthikesalingam A, Suleyman M, Corrado G, King D. Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):195.</mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list></back>
</article>