<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJMABHR</journal-id>
<journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>IJMABHR</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2582-8940</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Anfo Publication House</publisher-name></publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">152</article-id>
<title-group><article-title>Gestational age estimation in second and third trimesters of pregnancy by fetal Occipitofrontal diameter</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Dixit</surname><given-names>Sumit Kumar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sylonia</surname><given-names>Subhash C</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Garga</surname><given-names>Umesh C</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kuchay</surname><given-names>Ishfaq Ayoub</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"/></contrib>
<aff id="aff1"><label>1</label>Student, Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India</aff>
<aff id="aff2"><label>2</label>Professor and HOD, Department of Radio Diagnosis, Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India</aff>
<aff id="aff3"><label>3</label>Professor in Radio Diagnosis, Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India</aff>
<aff id="aff4"><label>4</label>Senior Resident, Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India</aff>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub"><year>2022</year></pub-date>
<volume>3</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>68</fpage>
<lpage>70</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>17</day><month>11</month><year>2022</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>06</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></date>
</history>
<permissions><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/?utm"><license-p>CC BY-NC-SA 4.0</license-p></license></permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://www.allmedicaljournal.com/article/152/gestational-age-estimation-in-second-and-third-trimesters-of-pregnancy-by-fetal-occipitofrontal"/>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://www.allmedicaljournal.com/article/152/download"/>
<abstract><p>Aim and objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of occipitofrontal diameter (OFD) in estimation of Gestational age (GA) in the second and third trimester of pregnancy.

Materials and method: This was a cross‑sectional study done to perform sonographic examination among pregnant woman in 2nd and 3rd trimester of pregnancy. The fetal biometrics (OFD, FL, and BPD) were calculated. Pearson correlation test was used to find correlation of GA with the fetal biometrics (OFD, FL, and BPD).

Results: The patients mean age was 25.12±4.56 years and mean GA depending on ultrasound was 27.98±0.53 (27–30) weeks. GA was strongly correlated with OFD (0.896), BPD (0.879) and FL (0.901).

Conclusion: OFD is an essential and reliable fetal biometric measure. OFD, FL, BPD, and GA demonstrated a strong correlation as well as a linear relationship. When BPD and FL are combined in regression models of OFD, GA is more accurately predicted than when BPD and FL are used separately.


 </p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author"><kwd>Gestational age</kwd><kwd>Occipitofrontal diameter</kwd></kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<back><ref-list><title>References</title>
<ref id="R1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Naseem F, Ali S, Basit U, Fatima N. Assessment of gestational age; comparison between trans cerebellar diameter versus femur length on ultrasound in third trimester of pregnancy. Professional Med J. 2014; 21(2):412-417.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Shan BP, Madheswaran M. Revised estimates of ultrasonographic markers for gestational age assessment of singleton pregnancies among Indian population. Int J Adv Sci Technol. 2010; 17:1-12.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, et al. Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters. Radiology. 1984; 152:497-501.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Campbell S, Warsof SL, Little D, et al. Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age. Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 65:613-20.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Sumit Babuta, Sangita Chauhan, Rohin Garg, Meenu Bagarhatta. Assessment of fetal gestational age in different trimesters from ultrasonographic measurements of various fetal biometric parameters. Journal of the Anatomical Society of India. 2013; 62(1):40-46.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Shehzad K, Ali M, Zaidi S. Fetal biometry. Pak J Med Sci. 2006; 22:503-8.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Kaswa R, Rupesinghe GFD, Longo-Mbenza B. Exploring the pregnant women’s perspective of late booking of antenatal care services at Mbekweni Health Centre in Eastern Cape, South Africa. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018; 10(1):e1-9</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Aliyu LD, Kurjak A, Wataganara T, de Sá RA, Pooh R, Sen C, et al. Ultrasound in Africa: what can really be done? J Perinat Med. 2016; 44(2):119-23.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, Chou D, Moller AB, Narwal R, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012; 379(9832):2162-72.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Gray DL1, Songster GS, Parvin CA, Crane JP. Cephalic index: A gestational age‑dependent biometric parameter. Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 74:600‑3.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Merz E, Bahlmann F. Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology. Thieme Medical Publishers, 2005. ISBN: 1588901475.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Sekulić S, Ilinčić M, Radeka G, Novakov‑Mikić A, Simić S, Podgorac J, et al. Breech presentation and the cornual‑fundal location of the placenta. Croat Med J. 2013; 54:198‑202.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Filipov E, Borisov I, Kolarov G. Placental location and its influence on the position of the fetus in the uterus. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2000; 40(4):11‑2.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Cinnusamy M, Shastri D, Martina JA. Estimation of gestational age by ultrasound measurement of fetal transcerebellar diameter. J Anat Soc India. 2021; 70:19-24.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Campbell S, Warsof SL, Little D, Cooper DJ. Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age. Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 65:613-20.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Peter M, Nayak AK, Giri PP, Jain MK. Fetal kidney length as a parameter for determination of gestational age from 20th week to term in healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancy. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017; 5:1869‑73.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Chang CH, Chang FM, Yu CH, Yao BL, Liang RI, Ko HC, et al. Fetal occipito-frontal diameter in normal pregnancy: Reappraisal by Altman&apos;s model. Journal of Medical Ultrasound. 1997; 5(1):5-11.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Hussein R, Gameraddin MB, A Malik BH, Yousef M, Turki Q. Evaluation of gestational age by fetal occipitofrontal diameter in second and third trimesters of pregnancy in Sudanese women. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 35:63-7.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Blaas HG, Eik‑Nes SH, Bremnes JB. The growth of the human embryo. A longitudinal biometric assessment from 7 to 12 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 12:346‑54.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Khadmallah AA, Mona MA. Estimation of Gestational Age by Occipitofrontal Diameter Using Ultrasound. SUST Repository, 2015, 83-4.</mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list></back>
</article>